Open Calculator →

Claude Opus 4.7 Pricing:
The Premium Model Cost Breakdown

Opus 4.7 is Anthropic's most capable model at $15/M input · $75/M output. This guide covers every token tier, real-world cost examples, and the key question: when is Opus actually worth the 5× premium over Sonnet?

Calculate My Opus Costs →

Claude Opus 4.7 — Official Pricing (2026)

Token Type Price per 1M Tokens Notes
Input (standard) $15.00 Fresh context on every call
Output $75.00 Generated tokens
Cache write $18.75 One-time fee to store a prompt block
Cache read Best value $1.50 Subsequent reads — 90% off standard input
Batch input 50% off $7.50 Async Batch API — offline workloads
Batch output 50% off $37.50 Async Batch API — offline workloads

Opus vs Sonnet vs Haiku — Cost Comparison

Model Input Output Cache Read Batch Input Relative Cost
Haiku 4.5 $0.80 $4.00 $0.08 $0.40
Sonnet 4.6 $3.00 $15.00 $0.30 $1.50 ~4×
Opus 4.7 $15.00 $75.00 $1.50 $7.50 ~19×

Real-World Cost Examples

All examples use standard (non-cached) pricing unless otherwise noted. Batch API pricing used for the batch column.

Analyze 1,000 complex support tickets

Tokens per ticket: 1,500 input + 500 output
Total tokens: 1.5B input + 500M output
Opus cost: 1,500 × $15/M + 500 × $75/M = $22.50 + $37.50 = $60.00
With Batch API (50% off): $30.00
If high-accuracy triage prevents even one critical escalation per 100 tickets, Opus pays for itself. At $0.06/ticket (standard) or $0.03/ticket (batch), it's still remarkably affordable at scale.

Generate 500 technical blog posts

Tokens per post: 2,000 input + 1,500 output
Total tokens: 1B input + 750M output
Opus cost: 1,000 × $15/M + 750 × $75/M = $15.00 + $56.25 = $71.25
Sonnet cost: 1,000 × $3/M + 750 × $15/M = $3.00 + $11.25 = $14.25
Sonnet is 5× cheaper here ($14.25 vs $71.25). For content at scale, Sonnet is the better default — upgrade individual posts to Opus only when depth matters most.

Run 200 autonomous coding sessions

Tokens per session: 10,000 input + 3,000 output
Total tokens: 2B input + 600M output
Opus cost: 2,000 × $15/M + 600 × $75/M = $30.00 + $45.00 = $75.00
Sonnet cost: 2,000 × $3/M + 600 × $15/M = $6.00 + $9.00 = $15.00
Opus is 5× more expensive ($75 vs $15). For agentic coding where a wrong architectural decision at step 2 costs hours of rework, Opus's deeper reasoning can save more than its $60 premium in engineering time.

Review 100 legal contracts

Tokens per contract: 8,000 input + 1,000 output
Total tokens: 800M input + 100M output
Opus cost: 800 × $15/M + 100 × $75/M = $12.00 + $7.50 = $19.50
Sonnet cost: 800 × $3/M + 100 × $15/M = $2.40 + $1.50 = $3.90
At $0.195/contract (Opus) vs $0.039/contract (Sonnet), Opus is still a fraction of human lawyer costs. For high-value contracts where a missed clause carries legal risk, the $15.60 premium over Sonnet is trivial.

When to Use Claude Opus 4.7

Opus is not automatically the right choice — it's the right tool for the right job. Use this decision guide to route tasks correctly and avoid paying the premium unnecessarily.

Use Opus 4.7 when…

  • Complex multi-step reasoning required
  • Architecture or system design decisions
  • Long-form research synthesis (>5,000 words)
  • High-stakes agentic tasks where errors cascade
  • Nuanced legal, medical, or financial analysis
  • Tasks where one mistake is costly to fix
  • Novel problem types without obvious templates

Use Sonnet or Haiku instead for…

  • Routine coding and debugging
  • Summarization of well-structured content
  • Text classification and labeling at scale
  • Customer support and FAQ responses
  • Draft generation that will be human-reviewed
  • Speed-sensitive real-time applications
  • High-volume tasks where unit cost matters

Frequently Asked Questions

How much does Claude Opus 4.7 cost?

Claude Opus 4.7 costs $15 per million input tokens and $75 per million output tokens. Prompt cache write tokens cost $18.75/M (first-time caching fee) and cache read tokens cost $1.50/M — about 90% off the standard input price for cached context. Compared to Sonnet 4.6 ($3/$15/M), Opus is 5× more expensive per token.

Is Claude Opus worth the price compared to Sonnet?

Opus 4.7 is worth the premium for tasks where reasoning quality directly affects outcomes: complex multi-step analysis, nuanced code architecture decisions, long-form research synthesis, and autonomous agent runs where errors cascade. For most everyday coding and writing tasks, Sonnet 4.6 delivers 90%+ of Opus quality at 20% of the cost. The ROI on Opus depends on task complexity — not model preference.

What is Claude Opus 4.7 pricing for cache tokens?

Cache write tokens (the one-time fee to store context) cost $18.75 per million tokens for Opus 4.7 — 25% above the standard input price. Cache read tokens cost $1.50/M — 90% below the standard input price. If your Opus workflow uses a repeated system prompt of 2,000 tokens across 1,000 calls, caching cuts the input cost from ~$30 to ~$3.

How does Claude Opus 4.7 compare to GPT-4o in cost?

Claude Opus 4.7 ($15/M input, $75/M output) is more expensive than GPT-4o ($2.50/M input, $10/M output) per token. However, Opus typically requires fewer tokens to complete complex tasks due to deeper reasoning, partially offsetting the per-token premium. For research synthesis and long-horizon coding tasks, total cost-per-task can be comparable.

How can I reduce Claude Opus API costs?

Three strategies: (1) Prompt caching — if your system prompt exceeds 1,024 tokens and is reused across calls, caching cuts read cost to $1.50/M (90% off). (2) Batch API — for offline workloads, batch processing gives 50% off: $7.50/M input, $37.50/M output. (3) Model routing — use Opus only for the subset of queries requiring peak capability; route simpler sub-tasks to Sonnet or Haiku. Combining all three can reduce effective Opus cost by 60–80%.